英语辩论赛主持？第一、你要针对这个辩题做一些阐述，记得要全面的不能凭你自己的意识，想说什么说什么啊。2方的观点都要提议下，然后第2步 第二、你要请双方辨手入场。第三，介绍评委团 第四、介绍辨手，并请他们自我介绍。第五正式进行辩论赛 第六、请正方一辩破日立论 ，你需要说时间啊，然后夸一下，那么，英语辩论赛主持？一起来了解一下吧。
主持人、各位评委，大家好！
今天非常高兴在此就善意的谎言是否有碍诚信的论点提出自己的意见。以下就是我方的看法：
善意的谎言本身即是谎言，这一点是无庸质疑的。谎言，说谎是欺骗，欺骗是不道德的，不道德的事不得人心，这些都是打小师长们就谆谆教诲过。但我们扪心自问，又有谁没有说过谎言呢？无论是对自己的亲人、朋友、还是不相识的人，目的也有很多种，但当我们给谎言加上一个“善意”时，仿佛大家都可能接受了，这正是人性的弱点的集中表现。
马克•吐温曾经说过这样一段话：“当你拿不定主意时，就说实话。它将令你的对手感到窘困，令你的朋友感到释然。”因此，心理学专家们的观点是：不要轻易扯谎，哪怕是善意的谎言。
(作者:吴蕴惠 09月25日09:35)
[主持人]:
请正方二辩发贴 (作者:张璇 09月25日09:35)
[主持人]:
请反方二辩发贴； (作者:张璇 09月25日09:37)
[反方]:
当贫穷的母亲把仅有的饭菜留给儿女，同时隐瞒了自己还饿着肚子的事实，难道您还要指责善良崇高的母爱“不诚信”吗？其实生活中我们随处可见善意的谎言的影子，从病榻前含泪的安慰到委婉拒绝时的客套，从爱人间的海枯石烂到诗人笔下的绮丽夸张，但它们都没有那么可怕，让对方辩友谈“谎”而色变。
Euthanasia Pros and ConsEuthanasia: The intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit. (If death is not intended, it is not an act of euthanasia)Arguments For Euthanasia:It provides a way to relieve extreme painIt provides a way of relief when a person's quality of life is lowFrees up medical funds to help other peopleIt is another case of freedom of choiceArguments Against Euthanasia:Euthanasia devalues human lifeEuthanasia can become a means of health care cost containmentPhysicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing deathThere is a "slippery slope" effect that has occurred where euthanasia has been first been legalized for onlythe terminally ill and later laws are changed to allow it for other people or to be done non-voluntarily.Arguments Against EuthanasiaEuthanasia would not only be for people who are "terminally ill"Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containmentEuthanasia will become non-voluntaryEuthanasia is a rejection of the importance and value of human life1. Euthanasia would not only be for people who are "terminally ill."There are two problems here -- the definition of "terminal" and the changes that have already taken place to extend euthanasia to those who aren't "terminally ill." There are many definitions for the word "terminal." For example, when he spoke to the National Press Club in 1992, Jack Kevorkian said that a terminal illness was "any disease that curtails life even for a day." The co-founder of the Hemlock Society often refers to "terminal old age." Some laws define "terminal" condition as one from which death will occur in a "relatively short time." Others state that "terminal" means that death is expected within six months or less.Even where a specific life expectancy (like six months) is referred to, medical experts acknowledge that it is virtually impossible to predict the life expectancy of a particular patient. Some people diagnosed as terminally ill don't die for years, if at all, from the diagnosed condition. Increasingly, however, euthanasia activists have dropped references to terminal illness, replacing them with such phrases as "hopelessly ill," "desperately ill," "incurably ill," "hopeless condition," and "meaningless life."An article in the journal, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, described assisted suicide guidelines for those with a hopeless condition. "Hopeless condition" was defined to include terminal illness, severe physical or psychological pain, physical or mental debilitation or deterioration, or a quality of life that is no longer acceptable to the individual. That means just about anybody who has a suicidal impulse .2. Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment"...physician-assisted suicide, if it became widespread, could become a profit-enhancing tool for big HMOs. ""...drugs used in assisted suicide cost only about $40, but that it could take $40,000 to treat a patient properly so that they don't want the "choice" of assisted suicide..." ... Wesley J. Smith, senior fellow at the Discovery Institute. Perhaps one of the most important developments in recent years is the increasing emphasis placed on health care providers to contain costs. In such a climate, euthanasia certainly could become a means of cost containment.In the United States, thousands of people have no medical insurance; studies have shown that the poor and minorities generally are not given access to available pain control, and managed-care facilities are offering physicians cash bonuses if they don't provide care for patients. With greater and greater emphasis being placed on managed care, many doctors are at financial risk when they provide treatment for their patients. Legalized euthanasia raises the potential for a profoundly dangerous situation in which doctors could find themselves far better off financially if a seriously ill or disabled person "chooses" to die rather than receive long-term care.Savings to the government may also become a consideration. This could take place if governments cut back on paying for treatment and care and replace them with the "treatment" of death. For example, immediately after the passage of Measure 16, Oregon's law permitting assisted suicide, Jean Thorne, the state's Medicaid Director, announced that physician-assisted suicide would be paid for as "comfort care" under the Oregon Health Plan which provides medical coverage for about 345,000 poor Oregonians. Within eighteen months of Measure 16's passage, the State of Oregon announced plans to cut back on health care coverage for poor state residents. In Canada, hospital stays are being shortened while, at the same time, funds have not been made available for home care for the sick and elderly. Registered nurses are being replaced with less expensive practical nurses. Patients are forced to endure long waits for many types of needed surgery.13. Euthanasia will only be voluntary, they say Emotional and psychological pressures could become overpowering for depressed or dependent people. If the choice of euthanasia is considered as good as a decision to receive care, many people will feel guilty for not choosing death. Financial considerations, added to the concern about "being a burden," could serve as powerful forces that would lead a person to "choose" euthanasia or assisted suicide.People for euthanasia say that voluntary euthanasia will not lead to involuntary euthanasia. They look at things as simply black and white. In real life there would be millions of situations each year where cases would not fall clearly into either category. Here are two:Example 1: anelderly person in a nursing home, who can barely understand a breakfast menu, is asked to sign a form consenting to be killed. Is this voluntary or involuntary? Will they be protected by the law? How? Right now the overall prohibition on killing stands in the way. Once one signature can sign away a person's life, what can be as strong a protection as the current absolute prohibition on direct killing? Answer: nothing.Example 2: a woman is suffering from depresssion and asks to be helped to commit suicide. One doctor sets up a practice to "help" such people. She and anyone who wants to die knows he will approve any such request. He does thousands a year for $200 each. How does the law protect people from him? Does it specify that a doctor can only approve 50 requests a year? 100? 150? If you don't think there are such doctors, just look at recent stories of doctors and nurses who are charged with murder for killing dozens or hundreds of patients.Legalized euthanasia would most likely progress to the stage where people, at a certain point, would be expected to volunteer to be killed. Think about this: What if your veternarian said that your ill dog would be better of "put out of her misery" by being "put to sleep" and you refused to consent. What would the vet and his assistants think? What would your friends think? Ten years from now, if a doctor told you your mother's "quality of life" was not worth living for and asked you, as the closest family member, to approve a "quick, painless ending of her life" and you refused how would doctors, nurses and others, conditioned to accept euthanasia as normal and right, treat you and your mother. Or, what if the approval was sought from your mother, who was depressed by her illness? Would she have the strength to refuse what everyone in the nursing home "expected" from seriously ill elderly people?The movement from voluntary to involuntary euthanasia would be like the movement of abortionfrom "only for the life or health of the mother" as was proclaimed by advocates 30 years ago to today's "abortion on demand even if the baby is half born". Euthanasia people state that abortion is something people choose - it is not forced on them and that voluntary euthanasia will not be forced on them either. They are missing the main point - it is not an issue of force - it isan issue of the way laws against an action can be broadened and expanded once something is declared legal . You don't need to be against abortion to appreciate the way the laws on abortion have changed and to see how it could well happen the same way with euthanasia/assisted suicide as soon as the door is opened to make it legal.4. Euthanasia is a rejection of the importance and value of human life. People who support euthanasia often say that it is already considered permissable to take human life under some circumstances such as self defense - but they miss the point that when one kills for self defense they are saving innocent life - either their own or someone else's. With euthanasia no one's life is being saved - life is only taken.History has taught us the dangers of euthanasia and that is why there are only two countries in the world today where it is legal. That is why almost all societies - even non-religious ones - for thousands of years have made euthanasia a crime. It is remarkable that euthanasia advocates today think they know better than the billions of people throughout history who have outlawed euthanasia - what makes the 50 year old euthanasia supporters in 2005 so wise that they think they can discard the accumulated wisdom of almost all societies of all time and open the door to the killing of innocent people? Have things changed? If they have, they are changes that should logically reduce the call for euthanasia - pain control medicines and procedure are far better than they have ever been any time in history.
一辩，二辩
Debater Number 1
Debater Number 2
评委团：judges
题目 Debating Competition
开头：welcome to the debating competition of the issue "题目" we have 6 debaters today, 3 on each side, and they are"名字”
now lets begin.开始
PPS英语角英语演讲大赛主持稿
X: Good evening ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the finals of the PPS English Speech Contest.
Y:尊敬的各位来宾，亲爱的同学们，大家（合）晚上好！欢迎来到PPS大学生英语演讲比赛决赛的现场。
X： Cosponsored by the Youth League Committee and the Students’ Federation of the Shanxi Medical University .This Competition is undertaken by the PPS English Corner
Y:本次演讲比赛由山西医科大学团委，山西医科大学社团联合会主办，山西医科大学PPS英语角承办.赞助
X：I hope we can express ourselves on the stage in English. I hope we can show what we have learned in the competition. I hope we can exchange experiences of how to learn English better． I hope we'll all make good use of this opportunity to improve ourselves.
Y:这是一个英语的舞台,一场英语的盛宴.希望每一位参赛选手可以在这里用英语展现自我,超越自我.希望在场的每位观众在为他们加油喝彩的同时对英语学习有新的感悟.
X:这是一个美丽的季节,一次美丽的相聚.希望每一位参赛选手可以在这里用真情诠释自己心中的美丽.也希望在场的美味观众能在聆听中感受到美的真谛，去发现，去感悟，去寻求生活中无处不在的美.
Y:
X: Firstly, let’s introduce today's honorable leader and guests.
Y:光临今天大赛现场的领导和嘉宾是：
X:
Y:
X:
Y:
X:让我们再次以热烈的掌声欢迎各位领导的到来！
Y: Welcome
X:今天来到比赛现场的还有来自各院系的领导、老师、参赛选手和观看比赛的同学们。
一辩，二辩
Debater Number 1
Debater Number 2
评委团：judges
题目 Debating Competition
开头：welcome to the debating competition of the issue "题目" we have 6 debaters today, 3 on each side, and they are"名字”
now lets begin.开始Good morning/afternoon/evening ladies and gentleman(or students),contestants and adjudicators(裁判).Today we are debating the topic (报一下辩论题目) On the affirmative side we have (报一下正方参赛者的顺序),and on the negative side we have (反方参赛者的顺序).
Both teams have showed great debating ability in today's fierce competition. Let us now await for the adjudicator's scoring. I am sure it is going to be very close.And I think all contestants need to be congratulated for their outstanding efforts.
The score is in, and the winner of today's debate is (报赢的一方)
Than you all for coming.
以上就是英语辩论赛主持的全部内容，国际交流经历：艾力老师曾是北京大学国际交流周夏季项目的优秀组织者，东京庆应大学国际交流周冬季项目的优秀代表，并参与了北京大学国际大学生模拟联合国AIMUN活动以及东北亚大学国会制英文辩论赛，具备出色的国际交流能力。主持与演讲能力：他在北京高校英文主持人大赛中获得决赛第二名和最受欢迎奖，内容来源于互联网，信息真伪需自行辨别。如有侵权请联系删除。
